With the quick spread of smartphones, mobile apps gained all our attention. The demand is so high, that we have apps for everything now, from 2048 to control over household appliances. The main benefit of apps is that you do not have to spare dozens of bookmarks in web-browser or stare at the obsolete web design for mobile devices. Just download a few apps for what you do most frequently, and do not waste your time on browsers. Nevertheless, mobile apps are traditionally associated with the waste of time on social media or video games.
The outcome of using apps depends on the user themselves – are they goal-oriented people or procrastinators? The first category will benefit from using educational software or apps issued by their healthcare provider. Some people do not intend to stare at the screen infinitely if there are pressing things to do (such people do exist). But most of the internet users see apps as a constant entertainment that follows them everywhere. No wonder, they will waste their time on the web and would strive to waste even more of it. The problem is that people are not really interested in their business or hobbies and try to enhance procrastinating by all means.
All of us are masters of their time. We do not allow other people to take away our free time to spare it for relaxation or fun. But ridiculously, we allow mobile apps to do so. All in all, we have all the power to delete useless apps and put our energy into something that means much more to us.
Yet at the very start of the Internet era, online safety was already a concern. Remember comedy film “You’ve got mail”? Its main characters behaved rather cautious when chatting with a completely unknown person. No names, no personal details, nothing that would ever expose them to danger in the real world. Their strategy can be taken as a pattern of a correct behavior in online chat rooms, but today there are much more obscene folks there. Sexting and cybersex are common for socialization platforms where strangers usually meet. Even chat rooms for teenagers look unsafe. Kids regularly report about obscene offers they receive from other users on the web.
The mere fact that chat rooms survived until now is quite strange. The first socialization websites, they have become too outdated as compared to social networks. The latter are much more amusing, informative, and safe, while old chat rooms present no more but a space full of strangers. They may be interesting for adults in search of adventures, but definitely not for teenagers or people who cherish their privacy. In chat rooms, you always have to stay alerted not to say something personal, which puts excessive pressure on people who seek just a small talk.
Online safety does not require extraordinary skills – every person can eliminate risks of cyberspace following a simple guideline. The only question is whether we want to stay in the place where predators attack us every minute. Apparently, there are other nice web platforms to communicate than ancient chat rooms.
Yet a few years ago, the possibility of spreading WiFi signals all over metropolitan areas pushed a huge debate. It clashed traditional cellular networks and Internet providers that take a great interest in their own coverage. Cellular networks saw the nationwide WiFi as a disaster. With the assault of the Internet, their revenues continue to fall as users do not wish to pay for cellular connection if free calls and messages are already there. At the same time, Google and other Internet giants would benefit from selling more ads and broadcasting their services nationwide. Over the years, the hype around the nationwide WiFi has fallen because of one serious complication. Providers still struggle to assure usable signals for more than just a few hundred people at a time.
As a matter of fact, we do not suffer from the lack of WiFi today. Most people have it at home and at work, where they spend 80 percent of their time. Besides, most public places supply free WiFi to the visitors, and the quality of connection is more than satisfactory. All households and organizations do not face the same problem of a bad signal or poor coverage that would make the nationwide WiFi a pathetic connection tool. Even in the rural areas, households make sure they have a reliable Internet connection today.
There is no point to argue that we do not need WiFi everywhere. Healthcare advocates may complain that irresponsible providers wrapped every public place in dense electromagnetic radiation, but they will be outnumbered by people who need WiFi everywhere. Today Internet is even more vital than cellular connection.
Interpersonal communication is a comprehensive category that includes workplace, group, intimate, and romantic interaction. Influenced by the Internet and its advantages, communication in all these spheres has largely transformed. 90% of individuals irrespective of their lifestyles are present on social networks every day. Each of us is accessible to the others every time. Our boss, spouse or completely unknown person can contact us whenever they need. People do not hesitate to interact, they cannot see any limits to communication now. And many of them find this exact factor discouraging.
A vast sociological research conducted in the US confirmed that the increase in wealth and quality of life caused higher isolation among Americans. Constant online accessibility made communication such a routine thing you want to avoid. Many people got tired of empty chatting that took their time and did not give back anything in particular. Under the impact of technology, we became lazier: why go hang out with peers if you are already connected online?
To put some advantages of technology, it simplified business communication. In many cases, you need only safe online connection to work productively and report your progress to the manager. Even in traditional offices, communicating per e-mail sufficiently accelerates performance. Technology has simplified interaction between a provider of services and their clients. In most cases, clients do not even need to communicate with the provider to get their services.
As a result, the impact of technology on interaction is diverse. We cannot address online channels of communication as a negative phenomenon because we gain even more than we loose with the Internet. In fact, the culture of communication is individual to all people, and those who use the net responsibly never complain about how dramatically the technology has changed their lives.